THE television screen turns into a static charge of salt and pepper
hiss. If you have the patience to linger to find out why, without
instantly switching to another channel, you will eventually learn that
this is what is in store for you if you are living in one of the four
metros; if you are served by cable, not DTH (direct to home); and if you
do not put in place that digital set-top box by the end of October. It
is a portentous public interest advertisement which serves notice on an
analogue media era and prepares to usher in the digital-only realm of
television viewing.
It is part of building the momentum, in the
wake of the Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Amendment Act of
2011, towards a total changeover to digital distribution via cable in
four stages: the four metros by October 31 this year; cities with a
population of over a million by March 31, 2013; all other urban centres
by the end of September 2014; and the rest of the country by the end of
the calendar year 2014. The conversion is both a legal and a
technological imperative. Digitise or perish is the writing on the wall.
You are damned if you do not.
It is not as self-evident,
though, that you’re not damned if you do. The democratic logic of
digitisation is better, cheaper, more equitable access and choice for
the consumer. The analogue hierarchy of a clutch of channels on prime
band that register effulgent clarity in picture and sound followed by a
longish tail of poor and poorer cousins on the less and lesser bands
with inferior, even indifferent, visual and audio quality is, in the
digital mode, replaced by a qualitative constant across the board where
the look and feel of each channel directly reflect the production input
and values of its content and there is no distribution diffusion. That
would be the one obvious change and would itself certainly make the
difference between night and day for those yet stuck with analogue
signals.
But the investments required for the digital rollout
and spread, the high-end consumerist appetites and values they
privilege, and the sheer scale of the operation put the business of
digital cable networking out of the league and out of the reach of the
small- or medium-scale entrepreneur. This new regime in the media
sector, as much as the policy and the law that propel it, is made to
order for digital capitalism.
The fat cats of the business have
already begun to parse the law to suit their rapacity, but are couching
it in terms of the best interests of the consumer. The path to
digitisation is paved with their good intentions. A recent conclave on
Media and Entertainment Business organised by the Federation of Indian
Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) in Chennai revealed, to mix
metaphors, their itchy palms in velvet gloves. In a panel discussion on
opportunities in the digitised era, the participants, who were among the
major stakeholders from the content and distribution side of the
industry, seemed in no doubt that the raison d’etre of digitisation was
consolidation and vertical integration of their businesses. There was a
queer money-minded nostalgia for the business advantages of the analogue
market being left behind,Shop for high quality wholesale parking sensor
system products on DHgate and get worldwide delivery. even as they
scrambled to take over the digital El Dorado of the future. They would,
if they could, have the best of both worlds, analogue and digital.We
have a wide selection of dry cabinet to choose from for your storage needs.
And
so, while they are agreed that digitisation would enable upscaled
quality, they are even more agreed that consumers must be prepared to
pay more for it; and we naively thought digital meant lower costs. The
revenue model in digital cable networks is, typically, subscription
driven so that advertisements do not hog and clutter airtime. But there
is a clear reluctance to part with advertisement revenues,Find the best iPhone headset
for you at Best Buy. and the upshot may well be that even as we pay
more we will continue to be subject to long stretches of commercials
interrupting programmes (as the witticism goes, a programme on
television is what happens between advertisements).
Then there
is the question of carriage fees, which acquires critical importance in a
situation where, more than ever before, how to get to be seen is the
despair of every new television channel. Thanks to digitisation, the
bandwidth required for one analogue transponder or channel is compressed
to spin off five or six new ones, making the transponder the least—from
the most—expensive component in the outlay for a new channel. But with
so many channels (there are over 600 on air now and as many or more
awaiting licences) jostling with one another for distribution, and with
no norms or rules in place, the big multi service operators (MSOs), like
their DTH counterparts,Offering lowest priced printed lanyard
in Canada. have been charging exorbitant and whimsical carriage fees,
skewing the field strongly in favour of the big media corporations which
can cough up such amounts, with hefty additional premiums for prime
placements. Those who cannot afford this are left out in the cold, and
there are so many instances of new channels having to repeatedly delay
their launch because of this acute distribution squeeze that the whole
process seems ridiculously weighed against the small and medium
players.Promotional custom keychain at ePromos Promotional Products.
没有评论:
发表评论